Perhaps once the Roman Empire is re-created in CK2, it is fixed onto elective monarchy so that it mirrors how the original empire wasn't so dynastic.ĭoes elective monarchy really cover the chaos of Rome though? I mean, there were decent stretches where Roman succession law was basically "biggest-army-geniture" Once Rome became an empire, I don't know of anyone making a serious attempt to restore the republic.
Originally posted by Fart_Gas:Yeah, but the game only allows playing as a merchant republic, not an oligarchic or administrative one (EU4 does though - so it can be implemented there). Military investiture would make them have a lower running cost, but you will instead get the chance of a Praetorian leader who simply hates you and wants to usurp you. The Roman Empire should be able to choose "Free" or "Military" investiture of the head of the Praetorians. The disadvantage is that they will be a constant expenditure, and if they get a leader who hates you, you will face Caligula's fate, or worse, he will fabricate and push his claim for the empire. The advantage of Praetorians is that they can be ordered to eliminate bad heirs and drastically improve assassination strength. The Praetorians are then landed with a titular Kingdom-level title. Once the Roman Empire is reformed by the Byzantines, there should be an event chain of "reform the Varangians". What I propose is that Anglo-Saxon characters can get the Varangian Guard event chain if they are vassals under a Norman King of England. Some historians believe that Edward the Exile was among them. By the reign of ERE Alexios I Komnenos, most of the Varangian Guard consisted of these Anglo-Saxon esapees.
After the Norman Conquest of England, some Anglo-Saxons fled.
0 kommentar(er)
